Strategic Roadmap: GCP ➞ AWS Migration with Minimal Downtime & Spend
Cloud migrations are rarely straightforward, especially between hyperscalers. The reality: mismatched primitives, subtle service differences, and the specter of downtime. Rushed execution here means ballooning costs and outages—worse if you touch data pipelines or stateful workloads.
Problem Statement
A SaaS analytics platform running reports nightly hits escalating costs on Google Cloud. Finance mandates a move to AWS—no more than two hours downtime. Core components: GKE for microservices, BigQuery for warehousing, Cloud Functions for scheduled ETL. Challenge: No loss of streaming data, same end-user DNS, and tight timeline.
1. Inventory & Evaluate GCP Dependencies
Don’t rely on IAM console exports. Use the gcloud asset export
command:
gcloud asset export --content-type=resource \
--output-path=gs://<BUCKET>/inventory.json \
--project=<PROJECT_ID>
Parse this exhaustively. Identify:
- GKE clusters (note versions; e.g., 1.26.x to match EKS possible node OS/distros)
- BigQuery datasets (size, region, update frequency)
- Pub/Sub topics and triggers
- Firewalls, VPCs, custom routes (for zero-trust or interconnect)
- Service accounts, KMS keys
Skills gap shows here: custom plugins or marketplace images must be noted for translation or replacement.
2. Service Mapping: GCP ➞ AWS
No 1:1 mapping exists. Example table:
GCP | AWS | Field Note |
---|---|---|
GKE | EKS | Pod spec changes likely; API differences post 1.22+ |
App Engine Flex | Elastic Beanstalk | YAML vs. JSON config; no built-in traffic splitting |
Cloud Functions | Lambda | Constraining: Lambda 15-min timeout vs GCF’s 9-min |
BigQuery | Redshift (or Athena) | BigQuery SQL ≠ Redshift SQL. Some function rewrites |
Cloud Storage | S3 | Strong global consistency vs. S3’s eventual by default |
Beware: BigQuery’s flat-rate pricing doesn’t parallel Redshift’s instance or on-demand pricing. Precompute queries’ new costs using the AWS Pricing Calculator.
3. Data Migration: Bottlenecks and Incremental Sync
BigQuery datasets >2TB are routine in analytics orgs.
Options:
- AWS Snowball Edge: Physically transfer petabyte-scale data; encrypts at rest and in transit.
- Custom ETL Pipelines: Use Apache Beam or Airflow to extract-incremental in batches (e.g., last-modified timestamp). Airflow DAGs can orchestrate between
bq extract
andaws s3 cp
.
Example Airflow snippet (PythonOperator):
extract = BashOperator(
task_id="extract_bq",
bash_command="bq extract --destination_format=CSV ...",
dag=dag
)
upload = BashOperator(
task_id="upload_s3",
bash_command="aws s3 cp ...",
dag=dag
)
Gotcha: BigQuery TYPEs (e.g., ARRAY
, STRUCT
) will need conversion logic. Do not expect numeric precision/scale to transfer natively.
For streaming pipelines: Implement dual-writes during cutover—Kafka Connect and Kinesis Data Firehose both support this, but partition mapping may differ.
4. Service Interlocks: Transition Without Breaking Chains
Integrated event-driven architectures are brittle during migration. Consider this case:
- GCP Cloud Functions process files on GCS.
- Target: AWS Lambda processing S3
ObjectCreated
events.
Steps:
- Deploy Lambda functions, connect to S3 event notifications.
- Set up batch sync (e.g.,
gsutil rsync
withaws s3 sync
) for new files. - Parallel run for >24 hrs, monitor logs for lost/duplicate events.
Error to expect:
[ERROR] KeyError: 'Records' - common if S3 event format changes
Handle with robust input validation.
Note: If latency increases on AWS, assess CloudWatch metrics; VPC endpoint misconfiguration can cause +100–300ms per event.
5. Cost Controls & Resource Rightsizing
Historical GCP utilization guides AWS capacity planning:
- Run
gcloud beta compute instances list --format="..."
for 30-day CPU/mem metrics. - Use AWS Compute Optimizer recommendations post-PoC; reject defaults blindly—performance profiles differ (e.g., c6g instances on AWS ARM vs. GCP n2d AMD).
Implement:
- Savings Plans for predictable users
- Instance families: If migrating Java microservices, don’t use t3.medium for stateful workloads; go r5 or m6i.
- Enable S3 Intelligent-Tiering early. Most forget—accumulated logs can bankrupt month two.
6. Automated End-to-End Validation
Test everything, or deal with midnight alerts post-cutover.
- Use data checksums:
md5sum
pre- and post-migration, audit 0.01% as a SRE baseline. - For service validation, consider ephemeral test harnesses (e.g., Terratest in Go).
Edge case: Certain API Gateway/Lambda combos have 30s client timeouts—different from Cloud Endpoints.
Stress test with tools like k6:
k6 run -u 1000 -d 5m script.js
If latency >20% increases, re-trace between NLBs and compute.
7. Cutover: Downtime, DNS, and Rollback
Plan for immutable DNS (Route 53 and Cloud DNS TTL at 60s pre-cut). Monitor for stale cache.
Maintain:
- Last-known-good GCP snapshot.
- Automated failback script (
terraform workspace select gcp-live && terraform apply
) as a parachute.
Avoid flipping until smoke tests turn green under synthetic and real loads. Don’t trust console “Completed” messages—check via CLI and direct application probes.
Side Strategies & Gotchas
- Iac Parity: Use Terraform v1.5+ with provider blocks for both clouds; track state separately to avoid surprise drifts.
- Unified Monitoring: Run Datadog or Grafana Tempo agents in both clouds—even during the overlap window.
- Secret Management: Transitioning from GCP KMS to AWS KMS isn’t transparent. Re-encrypt secrets before redeploy.
Known issue: IAM role mappings can break if account e-mail conventions differ. Reconcile users/SAML providers in advance.
Summary
Precision in mapping, staged data sync, and robust service cutover are what reduce risk—no shortcut. Spend time testing, automate war-room scenarios, and track not just “works” but “costs” pre- and post-migration. Alternative tools (Velero, CloudEndure, DMS) available, but be wary of their quirks.
Not everything will port perfectly. Sometimes rearchitecting is lower risk than “migrate as-is.” And every migration leaves a few loose ends—just document each one.
Real-world migration pain points or approaches that worked better? Log specifics, not just successes. Engineers will thank you next cycle.