Seamless Data Migration: Efficiently Moving Large Datasets from GCP to AWS
Lifting a multi-terabyte dataset from Google Cloud Platform (GCP) to Amazon Web Services (AWS) is rarely a single-click operation. Massive object buckets, live transactional data, and strict uptime requirements combine to make this a high-stakes exercise for any DevOps or data engineering team.
Why Bother Migrating?
Sometimes, it’s cost. Sometimes, it’s a push for GDPR compliance. More often, teams need AWS-native analytics—think Redshift or Bedrock. Occasionally it’s a straightforward need to avoid single-provider risk.
But theory won’t move petabytes.
The Bottlenecks
- Transfer scale: Wan links choke on big numbers—expect ~50MB/s per thread, far less at sustained peaks unless Direct Connect (AWS) or Dedicated Interconnect (GCP) is in play.
- Zero-downtime demand: You rarely get a global maintenance window.
- Data accuracy: Cross-region and cross-cloud means eventual consistency issues.
- Security policy: Public internet transfers raise compliance reviews; some teams must encrypt-in-transit using customer-managed keys.
Real stumbling block: cold runs reveal far higher egress charges and subtle failures than predicted by marketing docs.
Workflow: End-to-End Example for Cloud Storage → S3 Migration
Scenario: Move 10TB of imagery from GCS to S3, maintaining sub-hour staleness throughout.
1. Inventory & Dry Run
- Use
gsutil ls -l gs://bucket
anddu -sh
to validate object counts/sizes. - Identify long tails: “hot” prefix objects, infrequent but massive archives.
2. Bulk Transfer, Local or Direct
Option A: Disk hop (“brute force”)
gsutil -m rsync -r gs://my-gcp-bucket /data/tmp/ # ~2 Gbps with parallelism
aws s3 sync /data/tmp/ s3://my-target-bucket
Pros: Simple; bash-scriptable.
Cons: Requires double bandwidth and large ephemeral storage; subject to local disk/network reliability.
Option B: Cross-cloud direct
- Enable GCP Storage Transfer Service with AWS S3 as destination.
- For > 100TB, provision AWS Direct Connect and GCP Dedicated Interconnect.
- Target at least 10Gbps link—throttling is the real enemy here.
Known issue: GCP Storage Transfer Service still enforces some limits on S3 bucket region compatibility and may silently skip objects with legacy ACLs.
3. Handle Incremental Changes (Near-Real-Time Sync)
Bulk copy alone leaves a consistency gap. Two common patterns:
a) Event-based Sync
- Configure GCS Pub/Sub notifications for
OBJECT_FINALIZE
andOBJECT_DELETE
. - Deploy a Pub/Sub-triggered Cloud Function (or GKE workload) to queue deltas.
- For each event, push object to S3 via
boto3
API or AWS CLI.
b) Scheduled rsync
- Hourly
gsutil rsync
jobs, with--delete
flag for full parity. - Watch for
OverQuota
errors in logs:
Usually a sign to increase parallel thread count, or throttle during cloud-provider maintenance windows.CommandException: 503 Service Unavailable
4. Validate & Monitor
- Use object-level md5 hashes (
gsutil hash
vsaws s3api head-object
ETag) on a random sample. - For datasets >1M objects, automate compares in batches; don’t trust a single pass.
- Enable CloudWatch and Stackdriver error alerts.
Gotcha: S3 ETags change for multipart uploads. Always use checksum algorithms for binary verification, not raw ETag compare.
5. Cutover & Decommission
- Lower DNS TTL for all endpoints pointing at GCP-backed assets.
- After final delta sync, update clients to S3 URLs. Pause at least 24 hours for monitoring.
- Only then: destroy or archive old buckets. S3 and GCS billing cycles do not align; double-check invoice periods.
BigQuery → Redshift: Tabular Data Pipeline
- Use BigQuery
EXPORT DATA
(requires Standard SQL) to write Parquet files into GCS:EXPORT DATA OPTIONS( uri='gs://export-bucket/dt=2024-06-10/table-*.parquet', format='PARQUET' ) AS SELECT * FROM project.dataset.table;
- Migrate generated Parquet files to S3 as above.
- Use Redshift’s
COPY
withFORMAT AS PARQUET
:
Batch imports improve throughput; watch for Redshift disk temp space exhaustion.COPY schema.table FROM 's3://target-bucket/path' IAM_ROLE 'arn:aws:iam::ROLE/RedshiftLoad' FORMAT AS PARQUET;
Tip: Watch memory and concurrency limits on Redshift—use wlm_query_slot_count
for large imports.
Table: Direct Service Equivalents
GCP Service | AWS Analogue | Note |
---|---|---|
Cloud Storage | S3 | Lifecycle mgmt. syntax differs |
BigQuery | Redshift | Partitioning methods shift |
Pub/Sub | SNS/SQS | Different semantics (pull vs push) |
Cloud SQL | RDS | Migration can trigger downtime |
Non-obvious Lessons
- For objects >5GB, S3 multipart upload required (catch error:
EntityTooLarge
in logs). - Some networks throttle long-running TCP flows after 2-3 hours—prefer chunked, restartable transfers (see:
gsutil -m cp -c
flag for continue-on-error). - GCS bucket ACLs map poorly to S3 bucket policies; always audit permissions once complete.
Final Thoughts
No two migrations are identical—network capacity, internal approvals, and service limits will force tactical choices. Still, reliable outcomes come from up-front inventory, staged incremental sync, and brutal validation of data at each step.
Plan for double cloud costs short-term and make peace with a little imperfection—fixes for rare failures should be handled post-cutover during steady state, not under transfer-window stress.
Side note: AWS DataSync now supports GCS as a source, but as of v1.36 (2024-06) real-world throughput is still ~30% below direct S3 PUT via awscli.
Choose tools for your scale, test exhaustively, and don’t trust any single checksum pass—paranoia beats surprise every time.