How To Make Linux Distro

How To Make Linux Distro

Reading time1 min
#Linux#OpenSource#Tech#LinuxDistros#CustomLinux#LinuxFromScratch

Building a Linux Distribution: Engineering a Purpose-Built Operating System


A standard distribution can be dead weight when speed, security, or hardware parity drive your architectural requirements. Building a custom Linux OS isn’t the exclusive realm of large vendors—on the contrary, shaving off features you don’t need is often critical for embedded, field, or constrained workloads.


Rationale for a Custom Distro

  • Hardware-Specific Optimization

    • Example: fanless x86 gateways can benefit from stripped-down kernels without unneeded drivers and features, reducing memory footprint from ~250MB idle to sub-80MB.
    • For ARM-based SoCs, picking correct defconfig avoids driver bloat and unnecessary subsystems.
  • Minimized Attack Surface

    • Only install what you control. No PulseAudio or Avahi daemons if not needed. Auditable supply chain is the core advantage.
  • Full Ecosystem Control

    • Force a specific glibc or musl, lock in Python 3.10, prevent surprise systemd upgrades, or freeze package sets indefinitely.
  • Hands-On Learning

    • Touch kernel, init, build system, packaging, update mechanism. It's a practical deep-dive outside surface-level Linux administration.

Note: If you’re deploying at scale, the upfront time here is justified by reproducibility and easier CVE triage later.


Choosing the Approach

  • Absolute Ground-Up:

    • Use Linux From Scratch (LFS). All binaries are compiled by you. Fine for prototyping or infosec appliances. Error-prone—expect to debug dynamic linker issues (/lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found) and patch build scripts.
  • Customized Existing Base:

    • Most practical for the majority. Leverage Debian Live Build, Yocto, or Buildroot to define the operating environment, then customize as needed.
    ToolTarget Use CaseNotable Trade-Offs
    Debian LiveDesktop/Server, rapid protoLarger, general-purpose base
    Yocto ProjectEmbedded, reproducibleSteeper learning curve
    BuildrootSuper-minimal embeddedFewer packages; static focus
    ArchisoLive images, barebonesLess mainstream, rolling base

Don’t underestimate the learning curve: Yocto, for instance, is a build system, not a Linux distribution. Expect to write .bb recipes, manage layers, and hit compiler edge cases.


Walkthrough: Debian-Based Custom ISO for IoT (2024 Edition)

1. Environment Setup

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install live-build debootstrap squashfs-tools

Always note the versions (live-build/stable,now 1:20230513) to avoid “unknown option” errors due to CLI drift.

2. Project Directory

mkdir custom-os && cd custom-os

3. Configure Build Parameters

lb config --architectures armhf \
          --distribution bookworm \
          --archive-areas "main" \
          --linux-flavours armmp \
          --debian-installer false

Specify architecture and limit archive areas for minimalism. Bookworm (Debian 12) is current stable as of June 2024.

4. Package Selection

Edit or create config/package-lists/base.list.chroot:

busybox
openssh-server
ca-certificates
# Possibly drop bash for dash, if constraining
python3-minimal

Remove unnecessary desktop, syslog, and network daemons unless required.

5. Kernel Customization (Optional, But Often Needed)

For a kernel with PREEMPT_RT patches:

wget https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/linux-6.1.55.tar.xz
tar xf linux-6.1.55.tar.xz
cd linux-6.1.55
make menuconfig       # Set CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, strip drivers
make -j$(nproc)
sudo make modules_install
sudo make install

Replace the kernel image in the live-build config (config/binary_local-includes/boot/).

Gotcha: Kernel mismatch with initrd or missing firmware will cause boot failures. Check serial console/logs:

VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)

6. Injecting Custom Scripts or Defaults

Hooks in config/hooks/live/ allow root-level changes during image build:

File: config/hooks/live/00-banner.chroot

#!/bin/sh
echo "Welcome to FIELD_PROD_2024" > /etc/motd

Always mark hooks as executable.

For complex setups, use overlays (config/includes.chroot/etc/...).

7. Build the Image

sudo lb build 2>&1 | tee build.log

Address warnings:

W: Warnings occurred and were shown above. The build may still succeed.

If build fails, check for dependency mismatches in the logs.

8. Testing: Fast Feedback Loop

Ideal: test in QEMU before burning onto production SD or flash.

qemu-system-arm -M virt -cpu cortex-a15 -m 512M -kernel boot/vmlinuz-6.1.55-custom \
                -initrd boot/initrd.img-6.1.55-custom \
                -drive file=live-image-armhf.img,if=none,format=raw,id=hd \
                -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd

Note: Boot issue? Use -serial stdio for debugging console output.


Side Notes and Practical Tips

  • Alternative Build Systems: For truly static binaries, try Buildroot; less flexible than Yocto for updates, but excels at one-image-per-target.
  • Security: Don’t ship default SSH keys. Automate key injection or enforce runtime regeneration via a first-boot hook.
  • Reproducibility: Pin all package versions (e.g., via apt preferences or layer priorities in Yocto). Without this, rebuilds a year from now will differ.
  • Upgrades: Custom distros require a documented update path. Consider using OSTree or overlayfs-based updates if field-deployed.

Limitations

  • Upstream patches may break build scripts or drivers in unexpected ways.
  • Keeping up with CVEs is on you—no package manager’s automatic updates by default.
  • Debugging hardware bring-up is noisier versus generic distros, particularly around device trees and udev rules.

Conclusion

Building a custom Linux distribution is often necessary for high-control environments, security appliances, or devices constrained by hardware or compliance requirements. The real work lies in automation, reproducibility, and continuous maintenance—image creation itself is just the start.

Known issue: Upstream tools are sometimes poorly documented. Cross-reference distro wiki pages and GitHub issues for workarounds.


No template or automation replaces actual hardware tests.


Further Reading:


Have questions about real-world deployment or reproducible builds? Reach out or share failure cases—debugging is frequently where the best engineering happens.