Veeam Backup To Google Cloud Storage

Veeam Backup To Google Cloud Storage

Reading time1 min
#Cloud#Backup#Storage#Veeam#GoogleCloud#DataProtection

Optimizing Veeam Backup Workflows with Google Cloud Storage for Scalable Data Protection


Expanding local backup capacity isn’t just expensive—it’s increasingly impractical as data volumes outgrow traditional on-premises infrastructure. A hybrid approach, integrating Veeam Backup & Replication (v12/v12a) with Google Cloud Storage (GCS), offers a scalable and cost-efficient model—particularly when aggressive RPO/RTO targets collide with budget constraints and compliance requirements.


Primary Advantages of GCS as a Veeam Target

  • Elastic Scalability: GCS eliminates hard capacity ceilings. When daily VM image sizes spike, storage expansion is essentially a non-issue.
  • Tiered Cost Optimization: Map Veeam job retention periods to GCS storage classes (Standard, Nearline, Coldline, Archive). Example: use Nearline for 30+ day archives—retrievals are rare, storage is 60% cheaper.
  • Integrated Encryption: All data is encrypted in transit and at rest by default. Combine with Veeam’s built-in source-side encryption for stricter regulatory posture.
  • Durability and Geo-Redundancy: GCS buckets configured with Multi-Regional or Dual-Region options can absorb a zone/region failure without data loss. Useful when DR policies rule out any single-point cloud dependency.

Environment Preparation

Before Veeam can write to GCS, prepare the cloud platform for correct access and policy enforcement. For reference, these instructions assume Veeam Backup & Replication v12 and GCP console as of Q2 2024.

1. Create or select a GCP project

  • Use gcloud projects create for new, or navigate to an existing project via the GCP Console.

2. Provision a GCS bucket

gsutil mb -c nearline -l us-central1 gs://company-backup-bucket/
  • Bucket names must be globally unique.
  • Choose storage class (-c) and region (-l) according to anticipated egress/ingest patterns.

3. Service Account & Permissions

  • Grant only the required IAM roles: roles/storage.objectAdmin is sufficient. Overprivileging is a common risk here.
  • Generate a JSON key file for this service account:
    gcloud iam service-accounts keys create ~/veeam-gcs-key.json \
        --iam-account veeam-svc@your-project.iam.gserviceaccount.com
    
    Store the key securely; rotation is advised every ~180 days in regulated environments.

4. Enable required APIs

  • gcloud services enable storage.googleapis.com
    Missed API enables are the most common “Cannot connect to repository” failures in Veeam logs.

Veeam Side: Repository Configuration

Object Storage Repository Setup

  1. Open: Veeam Backup & Replication console.
  2. Navigate: Backup InfrastructureBackup RepositoriesAdd Repository.
  3. Type: Select Object storage > Google Cloud.
  4. Authentication: Upload the previously generated JSON key.
  5. Repository Details: Input the GCS bucket name.
    Example error if misconfigured:
    [CloudStorageError] Unable to list objects: invalid credentials or insufficient permissions.
    
    Adjust IAM or regenerate the JSON key if encountered.
  6. Apply Encryption (optional): Enable Veeam repo encryption for layered defense.

Scale-out Repository—Hybrid Use Case

Leverage a Scale-Out Backup Repository (SOBR):

  • Performance Tier: Local disk (e.g., SSD/NAS).
  • Capacity Tier: Google Cloud Storage bucket.
  • Set “Move backups to object storage as soon as possible” for large datasets to minimize on-prem storage risk.

Tip: Avoid mixing different cloud vendors in a single SOBR for simplicity and to minimize troubleshooting cross-provider inconsistencies.


Job Configuration for GCS Targets

When creating a new backup/archival job or modifying an existing one:

  • Target: Set GCS_Backup_Repo as the repository.
  • Advanced: Enable Veeam deduplication and compression—critical for controlling GCS object counts and egress cost.
  • Retention Policy: Use GFS (Grandfather-Father-Son) settings to control long-term versioning.
  • Archive Tiering: For low-access, enable bucket lifecycle policies:
    {
      "rule":
        [
          {
            "action": {"type": "SetStorageClass", "storageClass": "ARCHIVE"},
            "condition": {"age": 365}
          }
        ]
    }
    
    Upload this as a lifecycle policy via gsutil lifecycle set.

Gotcha: If using Archive class, restores can be delayed (15+ minutes typical); test non-critical backup retrievals during maintenance windows to avoid DR surprises.


Restore Operations

  • Find the required restore point in the Veeam console—RestoreFrom Object Storage Repository.
  • Initiate a restore; Veeam transparently handles staged retrieval from GCS.
  • For large datasets or Archive storage, plan for variable restore times and possible cost spikes on bulk egress.

Known issue: Some older VMs or large file restores may trigger temporary quota issues (429 Too Many Requests). Mitigate by requesting higher GCS bucket or project quotas prior to high-volume DR scenarios.


Practical Usage Example: VMware + GCS

Scenario:
SME with ~15TB total VM images, 10 VMs.

  • Nightly Veeam jobs → local 12TB RAID-10 NAS.
  • SOBR with GCS Nearline for capacity tier, target bucket sme-prod-backups.
  • Lifecycle: Retain last 7 days on-prem, older data moves to GCS after 7 days.
  • GCS policy moves objects to Archive after 365 days automatically.

Impact:
Monthly cloud storage cost dives below 30% of previous on-prem NAS expansions; recovery from GCS Nearline tests at 100–125MB/sec for single VM restores (bandwidth-limited).


Additional Notes

  • Monitoring & Alerts: Integrate GCP Monitoring to track bucket size/cost, set alerts on budget overruns.
  • Cost anomaly: Small files with high frequency (e.g., per-file backups) will incur higher GCS operations charges; aggregate with agent-side job settings when possible.
  • Compliance mode: For regulated workloads, activate Object Versioning and setup retention locks in GCS; this adds legal hold capability, but complicates cleanup.

Summary

GCS-backed Veeam repositories replace scaling headaches with predictable cost, geo-durability, and lifecycle controls. However, real-world efficiency depends on getting tiering, IAM least-privilege, and bucket lifecycle rules right from day one. Do dry runs for restores and bucket failovers before updating your DR documentation.

Not perfect—especially with cold tier restore lags, and the usual cloud egress costs—but hard to beat for mid-sized or distributed workloads growing beyond on-prem reach.